×
Home
Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Original article
Crossmark

Effects of treatment using the semantic feature analysis method on the improvement of narrative discourse in persons with fluent aphasias

By
Tanja Milovanović ,
Tanja Milovanović

University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Mile Vuković Orcid logo ,
Mile Vuković

University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Sindi Mitrović Orcid logo
Sindi Mitrović

University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Abstract

Patients with a fluent type of aphasia have semantically poor discourse, which is often uninformative for the interlocutor, having consequences for their daily life. One of the treatment methods used in clinical practice is the semantic feature analysis (SFA). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of this treatment method on the content of discourse in patients with fluent aphasia. The sample consisted of 30 subjects with fluent aphasia, namely: Wernicke's aphasia (9 subjects), conductive aphasia (6 subjects), transcortical sensory aphasia (8 subjects), and anomic aphasia (7 subjects). To assess the formation of narrative discourse, the picture subtest "Cake theft" from the Boston diagnostic test for aphasia was used. The content of the discourse was assessed by two experienced speech therapists - aphasiologists. After the treatment using the semantic feature analysis, an increase in the number of content words was observed in all patients (H = 22.53, df = 3, p < .001; H = 23.42, df = 3, p < .001; H = 23.10, df = 3, p < .001). Patients with Wernicke's and transcortical sensory aphasia had most impairment in the content/informativeness of discourse. Uninformative discourse was observed in 5 (33.33%) patients with Wernicke's and 4 (26.67%) patients with transcortical sensory aphasia. The type and severity of aphasia were shown to affect the informativeness of discourse. The semantic feature analysis treatment method leads to a significant improvement of narrative discourse in patients with milder forms of aphasia, such as anomic and conductive aphasia.

References

1.
Andreetta S, Cantagallo A, Marini A. Narrative discourse in anomic aphasia. Neuropsychologia. 2012;50(8):1787–93.
2.
Vuković M, Milovanović T, Jerkić L. Current methods in treatment of aphasia (Métodos actuales en el tratamiento de la afasia). Studies in Psychology. 2022;43(1):55–87.
3.
Silkes JP, Fergadiotis G, Graue K, Kendall DL. Effects of Phonomotor Therapy and Semantic Feature Analysis on Discourse Production. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2021;30(1S):441–54.
4.
Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Boston diagnosticaphasia examination booklet. 1983;
5.
Harris Wright H, Capilouto GJ. Considering a multi-level approach to understanding maintenance of global coherence in adults with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2012;26(5):656–72.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.