Sarcoidosis is a multi-organ disease and is characterized by sarcoidal noncaseating granuloma comprised of T-helper/inducer (CD4+) lymphocytes and scant cytotoxic (CD8+) T-lymphocytes. CD4+:CD8+ T-cell elevated ratio is a characteristic diagnostic parameter for sarcoidosis. This is the first report from Iran evaluating the CD4:CD8 ratio capability in differentiating pulmonary sarcoidosis from other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) on a large cohort. Fifty pulmonary sarcoidosis patients and 50 non-sarcoidosis interstitial lung diseases (nsILDs) patients were included in the current study. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed using flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy and flow cytometer. Non-sarcoidosis group was established by 50 components that were classified into eight subgroups. Fifty-two per cent of sarcoidosis patients and 62% of non-sarcoidosis interstitial lung disease patients had normal spirometric results. The CD4/CD8 ratio was significantly higher in sarcoidosis than in non-sarcoidosis interstitial lung diseases (p < 0.001). The CD4/CD8 ratio was found to be > 3.5 in 33.3%, 2.5–3.5 in 7.1%, 1.5–2.5 in 20.2% and < 1.5 in 39.4% of the entire study population. The best cut off point was 1.1 with the sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 80% for distinguishing sarcoidosis from other interstitial lung diseases. Performing bronchoalveolar lavage as the safe and rapid first step confirms the diagnosis of sarcoidosis in 92% of cases (current study sensitivity). Hence, performing an invasive procedure was required in a few patients only.
Bronchoalveolar lavage flow cytometry in the assessment of clinical and radiological findings supplies an appropriate diagnostic adjunct for discriminating sarcoidosis from non-sarcoidosis interstitial lung diseases.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
0
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.