×
Home
Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Review article
Crossmark

Protein-protein interaction networks and protein-ligand docking: Contemporary insights and future perspectives

By
Aleksandar Velesinović ,
Aleksandar Velesinović
Goran Nikolić
Goran Nikolić

Abstract

Traditional research means, such as in vitro and in vivo models, have consistently been used by scientists to test hypotheses in biochemistry. Computational (in silico) methods have been increasingly devised and applied to testing and hypothesis development in biochemistry over the last decade. The aim of in silico methods is to analyze the quantitative aspects of scientific (big) data, whether these are stored in databases for large data or generated with the use of sophisticated modeling and simulation tools; to gain a fundamental understanding of numerous biochemical processes related, in particular, to large biological macromolecules by applying computational means to big biological data sets, and by computing biological system behavior. Computational methods used in biochemistry studies include proteomics-based bioinformatics, genome-wide mapping of protein-DNA interaction, as well as high-throughput mapping of the protein-protein interaction networks. Some of the vastly used molecular modeling and simulation techniques are Monte Carlo and Langevin (stochastic, Brownian) dynamics, statistical thermodynamics, molecular dynamics, continuum electrostatics, protein-ligand docking, protein-ligand affinity calculations, protein modeling techniques, and the protein folding process and enzyme action computer simulation. This paper presents a short review of two important methods used in the studies of biochemistry - protein-ligand docking and the prediction of protein-protein interaction networks.

References

1.
Lambrinidis G, Vallianatou T, Tsantili-Kakoulidou A. In vitro, in silico and integrated strategies for the estimation of plasma protein binding. A review. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2015;86:27–45.
2.
Cicaloni V, Trezza A, Pettini F, Spiga O. Applications of in Silico Methods for Design and Development of Drugs Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2019;19(7):534–54.
3.
Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR. Deciphering Protein–Protein Interactions. Part I. Experimental Techniques and Databases. PLoS Computational Biology. 3(3):e42.
4.
Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR. Deciphering Protein–Protein Interactions. Part II. Computational Methods to Predict Protein and Domain Interaction Partners. PLoS Computational Biology. 3(4):e43.
5.
Orchard S, Kerrien S, Abbani S, Aranda B, Bhate J, Bidwell S, et al. Protein interaction data curation: the International Molecular Exchange (IMEx) consortium. Nature Methods. 2012;9(4):345–50.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Citations

Crossref Logo

3

Crossref Logo

Marko Karović, Boško Nikolić, Nikola Nedeljković, Marina Vesović, Miloš Nikolić

(2024)

Design of vonoprazan pyrazole derivatives as potential reversible inhibitors of gastric proton pump: An in silico molecular docking study

AFMN Biomedicine, 41(1)

10.5937/afmnai41-43298

Crossref Logo

Prasanna Kumar Rangarajan, Bharathi Mohan Gurusamy, Elakkiya Rajasekar, Srisurya Ippatapu Venkata, Spandana Chereddy

(2024)

Retroactive data structure for protein–protein interaction in lung cancer using Dijkstra algorithm

International Journal of Information Technology, 16(2)

10.1007/s41870-023-01557-4

Crossref Logo

John Noone, Robert G. Wallace, Keith D. Rochfort

(2023)

Protein Chromatography

Methods in Molecular Biology, 2699()

10.1007/978-1-0716-3362-5_15

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.