×
Home
Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Review article
Crossmark

Neurorehabilitation in children neurorehabilitation in children with cerebrovascular insult: Why are we late?

By
Hristina Čolović Orcid logo ,
Hristina Čolović

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Dragan Zlatanović Orcid logo ,
Dragan Zlatanović

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Vesna Živković Orcid logo ,
Vesna Živković

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Anita Stanković ,
Anita Stanković

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Dejan Nikolić Orcid logo
Dejan Nikolić

University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Abstract

Pediatric stroke (PS) is a rare disease with the global incidence of 1.2 -13/100,000, but nevertheless, is an important cause of disability in children. What makes it a challenging research topic is its alarming upsurge in the prevalence of 35%. The most prevalent motor deficit in that regard is hemiparesis in 50% to 80% of children with PS. The following databases were used for the purpose of this study: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar. Asymptomatic clinical picture and a very rare use of indicated hyperacute recanalization therapy make rehabilitation the primary therapeutic approach in children affected with PS. The present studies suggest that the greater capacity of brain neuroplasticity in children can be relevant in recovery, but also indicate some specific consequences of injury made to a developing brain. Robotic neurorehabilitation (RNR) activates brain neuroplasticity, i.e. stimulates new motor learning which contributes to motor function recovery after brain damage. RNR, in combination with virtual reality, is able to expand the effects of conventional rehabilitation, the children find it interesting, and it motivates them to be actively involved in time-consuming, specific, high-intensity exercises. Motor recovery is intensified by learning and repetition of tasks, with a robot providing additional strength in the performance of movements, with continual measurements of objective parameters.The recommendations for use of RNR in children affected with PS are based on expert consensus and weak evidence, since there is lack of randomized, controlled studies.

References

1.
Roash ES, Lo Warren D, Heyer Geoffrey L. Pediatric Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disorders. 2012.
2.
Ferriero DM, Fullerton HJ, Bernard TJ, Billinghurst L, Daniels SR, DeBaun MR, et al. Management of Stroke in Neonates and Children: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;50(3).
3.
Platt MJ, Cans C, Johnson A, Surman G, Topp M, Torrioli MG, et al. Trends in cerebral palsy among infants of very low birthweight (<1500 g) or born prematurely (<32 weeks) in 16 European centres: a database study. The Lancet. 2007;369(9555):43–50.
4.
Krishnamurthi RV, deVeber G, Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, Fullerton H, Mackay MT, et al. Stroke Prevalence, Mortality and Disability-Adjusted Life Years in Children and Youth Aged 0-19 Years: Data from the Global and Regional Burden of Stroke 2013. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):177–89.
5.
Wafa HA, Wolfe CDA, Emmett E, Roth GA, Johnson CO, Wang Y. Burden of Stroke in Europe. Stroke. 2020;51(8):2418–27.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.