×
Home
Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Original article
Crossmark

Evaluation of the mandibular canal course in Southeast Serbian population: A cone beam computed tomography study

By
Kosta Todorović Orcid logo ,
Kosta Todorović

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Marija Daković-Bjelaković Orcid logo ,
Marija Daković-Bjelaković

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Jelena Popović Orcid logo ,
Jelena Popović

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Aleksandar Mitić Orcid logo ,
Aleksandar Mitić

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Antonije Stanković Orcid logo ,
Antonije Stanković

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Ana Todorović ,
Ana Todorović

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Nenad Stošić Orcid logo ,
Nenad Stošić

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Marija Nikolić Orcid logo
Marija Nikolić

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Abstract

Oral surgical interventions in the mandibular region require detailed knowledge of the position and course of the mandibular canal. The aim of this study was to determine the most common course of mandibular canal on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in the population of Southeast Serbia. One hundred ninety-four mandibular canals on CBCT images of 97 patients (48 male and 49 female) aged 18-65 years were analyzed in the study. According to Worthington, courses of mandibular canals are classified into catenary, descending, and straight. The obtained results were analyzed in relation to the gender and the age of the patients as well as to the left and right side of the mandible. The most common course of mandibular canal on the analyzed images was catenary (41.2%), then straight (37.1%), while the least was descending (21.6%). The most common type in males was the catenary (46.9%), while the straight type was the most common in females (39.6%). Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the distribution of the mandibular canal course in relation to the gender, age of the patients, and the side of the mandible. The observed variations emphasize the importance of careful individual preoperative analysis of CBCT images of each patient as well as planning different treatment modalities in the region of the mandible.

References

1.
Asghar A, Priya A, Ravi KS, Iwanaga J, Tubbs RS, Naaz S, et al. An evaluation of mandibular canal variations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anatomical Science International. 2023;98(2):176–84.
2.
Valenzuela-Fuenzalida JJ, Cariseo C, Gold M, Díaz D, Orellana M, Iwanaga J. Anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and their clinical implications in dental practice: a literature review. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2021;43(8):1259–72.
3.
ALGHAMDI HS, JANSEN JA. The development and future of dental implants. Dental Materials Journal. 2020;39(2):167–72.
4.
Zahedi S, Mostafavi M, Lotfirikan N. Anatomic Study of Mandibular Posterior Teeth Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Endodontic Surgery. Journal of Endodontics. 2018;44(5):738–43.
5.
Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1).

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.