×
Home
Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Original article
Crossmark

Effect of robotic-assisted gait training as adjunct to traditional therapy on motor impairments in children with cerebral palsy

By
Dragana Đurić ,
Dragana Đurić
Snežana Ilić ,
Snežana Ilić

University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Alameri Shaima ,
Alameri Shaima
Almenhali Ameera ,
Almenhali Ameera
Al Tariq
Al Tariq

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait treadmill training (Lokomat) as an adjunct to traditional physiotherapy in improving the range of motion, muscle strength and decreasing spasticity in lower extremities in children with cerebral palsy. Twenty-six participants, with mean 7.69 ± 2.90 years, levels I-IV on Gross Motor Classification System (38.5% level I-II and 61.5% level III-IV) with a bilateral and unilateral form of cerebral palsy underwent intensive 20 Lokomat and 20 traditional physiotherapy sessions, each training session lasting 40 minutes. Preand post-testing was done using goniometer measure, manual muscle testing and modified Ashworth scale. Positive effects were seen in participant who underwent a combination of Lokomat training and traditional therapy. An increase in the range of motion was minimal (2 - 4 degrees) in hip flexion, extension, and abduction. A significant improvement was achieved in ankle dorsiflexion on the right (p = 0.003) and left side (p = 0.006), while the values of knee extension for the left and right extremity were p = 0.062 left and p = 0.075, respectively. An increase in muscle strength of the lower limb was seen in 30.8% - 80% of participants. Reduction of spasticity in adductors, hamstrings and gastrocnemius were seen in 26.9% of participants. Lokomat training is an adjunct to conventional physiotherapy treatment. It has a negligible effect on the increase in the range of motion and muscle strength of the lower limb and reduction of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy.

References

1.
Oskoui M, Coutinho F, Dykeman J, Jetté N, Pringsheim T. An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2013;55(6):509–19.
2.
World Health Organization International classification of function, disability, and health. World Health Organization. 2001;
3.
Wichers M, Hilberink S, Roebroeck M, van Nieuwenhuizen O, Stam H. Motor impairments and activity limitations in children with spastic cerebral palsy: A Dutch population-based study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2009;41(5):367–74.
4.
Østensjø S, Carlberg EB, Vøllestad NK. Motor impairments in young children with cerebral palsy: relationship to gross motor function and everyday activities. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2004;46(9):580–9.
5.
Papageorgiou E, Simon-Martinez C, Molenaers G, Ortibus E, Van Campenhout A, Desloovere K. Are spasticity, weakness, selectivity, and passive range of motion related to gait deviations in children with spastic cerebral palsy? A statistical parametric mapping study. PLOS ONE. 14(10):e0223363.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Citations

Crossref Logo

3

Crossref Logo

Dragana Djuric, Sunitha Bhagavathi Mysore, Tariq Al Yamani, Ahmed Isleem, Adam Zeghan, Muhammad Al Jarrah

(2025)

Parent perspectives on robotic-assisted gait training for children with cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional study

Medicinski pregled, 78(5-8)

10.2298/MPNS2508159D

Crossref Logo

Denis Arsovski, Aleksandra Karovska-Ristovska, Goran Ajdinski, Olivera Rashikj-Canevska

(2024)

THE USE OF ROBOTIC REHABILITATION IN THE TREATMENT OF MOTOR IMPAIRMENTS IN CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL PALSY –A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Research in Education and Rehabilitation, 7(2)

10.51558/2744-1555.2024.7.2.260

Crossref Logo

Dragana Djuric, Sunitha Mysore

(2024)

Perspective of robotic-assisted treadmill training effect in children with cerebral palsy on motor functions and gait

Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo, 152(7-8)

10.2298/SARH240307047D

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.