×
Home
Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Review article
Crossmark

Overview of the possibility of bone replacement for the purpose of pre-prosthetic preparation of the patient

By
Marko Igić ,
Marko Igić

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Milena Kostić Orcid logo ,
Milena Kostić

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Ana Pejčić Orcid logo ,
Ana Pejčić

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Nikola Gligorijević ,
Nikola Gligorijević

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Marija Jovanović ,
Marija Jovanović

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Nenad Stošić Orcid logo
Nenad Stošić

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Abstract

The loss of the jaw bone, especially in the area of the alveolar process, can significantly complicate the procedure of prosthetic rehabilitation of prosthetic patients. The reason for the loss of the jaw bones are physiological and pathological processes. Bone replacements are widely used in the reconstruction of bone defects. The optimal characteristics of these materials are biocompatibility, bioinertness, biofunctionality and a special canalicular and intercanalicular system. Alloplastic bone replacements are inorganic, synthetic, biocompatible and bioactive bone replacements with osteoinductive potential. Hydroxyapatite is a preparation based on calcium phosphate. It has high biocompatibility, low immunogenicity and good osteoconductive characteristics. Poor properties are poor mechanical resistance as well as a low degree of resorption. Therefore, the research of chemically modified hydroxyapatites containing different ions was started. Calcium ions can be replaced by various metal ions like cobalt, aluminum, nickel, manganese, chromium, copper in a liquid medium.

References

1.
Farmer M, Darby I. Ridge dimensional changes following single‐tooth extraction in the aesthetic zone. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2014;25(2):272–7.
2.
Hansson S, Halldin A. Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: A consequence of a fundamental principle of bone physiology. Journal of Dental Biomechanics. 2012;3(0).
3.
Majzoub J, Ravida A, Starch-Jensen T, Tattan M, Suárez-López del Amo F. The Influence of Different Grafting Materials on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: a Systematic Review. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research. 10(3).
4.
Moy PK. Clinical Experience with Osseous Site Development Using Autogenous Bone, Bone Graft Substitutes, and Membrane Barriers. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2001;13(3):493–509.
5.
Mertens C, Decker C, Seeberger R, Hoffmann J, Sander A, Freier K. Early bone resorption after vertical bone augmentation – a comparison of calvarial and iliac grafts. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2013;24(7):820–5.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.