×
Home
Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Original article
Crossmark

Proposed models for genetic counseling: Which quality indicators by Donabedian's model are more feasible?

By
Marija Lević ,
Marija Lević
Dušanka Krajnović Orcid logo ,
Dušanka Krajnović
Valentina Marinković Orcid logo
Valentina Marinković

Abstract

Genetic counselling is a complex process that helps people to understand and adopt medical, psychological and genetic aspects of the disease and enable them to make an appropriate decision. In this framework, we revisited all the existing models for decision-making and suggested their use in the process of genetic counselling, which may lead to more equitable and more favourable outcomes. Also, Donabedian's (Structure-Process-Outcome) model for the development of key performance indicators was applied to assess the quality in the process of genetic counselling. Quality indicators at SPO model in the process of genetic counselling were proposed. The social, economic and humanistic outcomes have also been identified. All defined quality indicators together represent a framework for monitoring, evaluation and continuous improvement of the process of genetic counselling. Although the new medical services of genetic counselling tend to be developed as a powerful multidisciplinary field, the implementation of quality management model will certainly help the development of collaborative practice.

References

1.
Haga S, Burke W, Ginsburg G, Mills R, Agans R. Primary care physicians’ knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing. Clinical Genetics. 2012;82(4):388–94.
2.
Skirton H, Lewis C, Kent A, Coviello DA. Genetic education and the challenge of genomic medicine: development of core competences to support preparation of health professionals in Europe. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2010;18(9):972–7.
3.
Green MJ, McInerney AM, Biesecker BB, Fost N. Education about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: Patient preferences for a computer program or genetic counselor. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 2001;103(1):24–31.
4.
Beth B. Genetic Consultation/Counseling: The Process. Genzyme Genetics. 1996;
5.
Bernhardt BA, Biesecker BB, Goals MCL. Benefits, and Outcomes of Genetic Counseling: Client and Genetic Counselor Assessment. Am J Med Genet. 2000;94(3):189–97.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.