×
Home
Current Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Research paper

Importance of External Fixation in Primary Treatment of War Wounds to the Extremities

By
Predrag Grubor ,
Milan Grubor ,
Milan Grubor
Ivan Golubović ,
Ivan Golubović
Predrag Stojiljković ,
Predrag Stojiljković
Zoran Golubović
Zoran Golubović

Abstract

A war wound is damage to the body having great kinetic energy, inflicted by firearms, (blast, projectile, burn) and sustained in wartime. It is characterised by massive destruction, primary contamination and modified reactivity of the body.  
The aim of this retrospective study was to show how to primarily treat the injured extremities, with and without fractures, as well as how to select the method for stabilizing fractured bones.
The study involved 2.462 wounded persons. They sustained injuries to the extremities, abdomen, thorax and head, and, having sustained the wounds, they received primary surgical treatment at the Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinic in Banja Luka in the period between September 15, 1991 and December 1, 1995. Out of the 2.462 wounded subjects, 122 (4.59%) were women, 24 (0.9%) were children and 2.269 (94.15%) were men. The average age of the wounded was 33.73 years. Two hundred sixty-five (10.77%) subjects sustained muscular and cutaneous injuries to the extremities, without bone fractures, and 2.197 (89.23%) wounded persons had broken bone fragments that required stabilisation after the primary surgical treatment. Out of the 2.197 wounded persons with broken bones, 2.043 (92.43%) sustained 
cumminuted fractures with or without bone defects. In 1.573 (72%) cases, broken bone fragments were primarily stabilized using external fixators, in 531(24%) cases plaster cast and plaster cast in combination with Steinmann pins and Kirschner needles, and in 91(4%) cases  we used extension.
The most commonly encountered complications  with external fixators use were as follows: 86 (5.46%) pin tract infections, 3 (0.19%) pin breakages, 42 (2.66%) fixator reassembly procedures due to inadequate primary placement of the external fixator, 6 (0.38%) iatrogenic vascular lesions inflicted with the drill or pin and 4 (0.25%) iatrogenic nerve lesions. 
The complexity, specific nature and originality of every war wound require expertise, experience, attention and diligence. Every patient is a separate entity and they require an active attitude throughout the course of treatment.  
The experiences gained in the last war (working with 28 types of external fixators) and the results obtained give me the right to maintain that the method of choice for primary stabilisation of bone fragments in war wounds is Mitković’s external fixation type M20.

References

1.
D MK, WK H. Small animal anesthe sia. St. 1994.
2.
Grubor P. Manual of external fixation in management of war wounds. 1996.
3.
Grubor P, Mitković M. Application of external fixator Mitković in the treatment of war wounds of anatomic and surgical humeral neck. In: XII International Con grees of Emergency Surgery and Intensive Care 1995. p. 73–4.
4.
Gustillo R, Mendosa R, Williams D. Problems in the management of type III open fractures:A new classifi cation of type III fractures. J Trauma. 1984;24(8):742.
5.
Lj K. Značaj morfoloških karakteristika strelnih rana nanesenih projektilima velike početne brzine na primarnu hiruršku obradu. Acta chirurgica Jugoslavica. 1976;120–4.
6.
Lj B. Osteomijelitis. 1981.
7.
Papo I. Ratna hirurgija. 1980.
8.
Grubor P. Uloga spoljnje fiksacije u zbrinjavanju ratne rane. 1996.
9.
Mana gement of Open Fractures.United. 1996.
10.
Gustillo R, Mendoza R, Williams D. Problems in the management of type III open fracturea; A eew clasifi cation of type III open fracture. J Trauma. 1984;24(8):742.
11.
Ivankovski A, Miljković I, Roje J, Stojkovski K, FridrhS. Liječenje kroničnog fistuloznog posttraumatskog oste omijelitisa primjenom različitih metoda. XVI Ortoped ski i Traumatološki dani Jugoslavije. 1986;87–9.
12.
Mitković M, Cvetanović S. Naša iskustva u liječenju hroničnog osteomijelitisa. XVI Ortopedski i Traumatološki dani Jugoslavije;1986; Priština, SFRJ. Zbornik Radova. 1986;63–5.
13.
Witschi T, Omer G. The treatment of open tibial shaft fractures from Wietnam war. J Trauma. 1970;10(2):105–11.
14.
Grubor P. Tretman koštanih defekata. 1999.
15.
Janković Ž, Popović S. Anatomija domaćih životinja. 1988;
16.
Wray JB. Acute changes in femoral arterial blood flow after slosed tibial fracture in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg. 1964;46A:1262-1268.
17.
Wray JB, Goodman HO. Post - fracture vascular phenomen and long bone overgrowth in immature ske leton of the rat. J Bone Joint Surg. 1961;43A:1047 1055.
18.
Wray JB. and Lynch CJ.The vascular response the fra cture of the tibia in the rat. J Bone Joint Surg. 1959;
19.
Rand JA, Chao EYS, Kelly PJ. A comparasion of the effect of open intramedullary nailing and compresion plate fixation on fracture-site blood flow and fracture union. J Bone Joint Surg. 1981;
20.
Paradis GR, Kelly PJ. Blood flow and mineral deposi tion in canine tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 1975;57 A:220-226.
21.
Belokurov NJ. Dinamika krovosnabženija nižnih kone čnostej pri perelomah kostej. OrtopTraumat Protez. 1962;2:33–7.
22.
Stojanović VK. Hirurška obrada ratne rane. Acta hirur gica Jugoslavica. 1976;43–7.
23.
rana PDR. Sekcija za ortopedsku hirur giju SLD-a. 1991;
24.
Piščević S. Nova oružja i osobenosti njihovog dejstva na organizam. Acta hirurgica Yugoslavica. 1976;19:23.
25.
Popović Z. Rigidna osteosinteza AO pločom i spongio plastica po Phemistru u sekundarnom liječenju dijafi zarnih strelnih preloma (Doktorska disertacija. 1996.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.