×
Home
Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Original article

Routine Coronary Angiography and Revascularization after Thrombolysis: Impact on One-Year Prognosis

By
Danijela Đorđević-Radojković ,
Danijela Đorđević-Radojković
Contact Danijela Đorđević-Radojković
Zoran Perišić ,
Zoran Perišić
Svetlana Apostolović ,
Svetlana Apostolović
Miodrag Damjanović ,
Miodrag Damjanović
Milan Pavlović ,
Milan Pavlović
Dušan Milenković
Dušan Milenković

Abstract

The most often used reperfusion strategy for patients with STEMI is still thrombolysis, but it is not the end of treatment. The aim of this paper was to show whether routine in-hospital coronary angiography and subsequent revascularization (percutaneous or surgery) after thrombolysis improve an one-year prognosis in patients with STEMI.  The study involved 155 patients, 29-79 years old, with first STEMI. They were treated with fibrinolytic, aspirin, and enoxaparin. Group I (102 patients) underwent coronary angiography on approximately the 5th day of hospitalization, then percutaneously or surgically revascularized if considered appropriate. In group II (53 patients), in-hospital angiography was not done. Mortality, reinfarction, angina and left ventricular systolic function were analyzed during one-year period. Patients in group II were older, they received clopidogrel and statin less frequently and ACE inhibitors more frequently. The groups were significantly different regarding the in-hospital (3% vs. 15%, p = 0.008) and one-year mortality (2% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.03). There was a numeric trend for higher frequency of reinfarction in group II (3% vs. 11.1%, p=0.06). After one year, more patients in group II had angina (2.9% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.03). In hospital, the groups had similar EF (54% vs. 51.2%, ns), but after one year EF in group I was higher (55.2% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.02). Multivariable analysis adjusted for age and differences in drug therapy showed that the lack of routine elective coronary angiography and revascularization is an independent predictor of one-year mortality (RR 4.7, p = 0.019) and independent predictor of combined mortality, reinfarction and angina (RR 3.2, p = 0.028). Routine coronary angiography and revascularization after thrombolysis improve in-hospital and oneyear survival, decrease the frequency of reinfarction and angina, and improve the left ventricular function.

References

1.
Abbate A, Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GLG. ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction: reperfusion at any cost? Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1813–5.
2.
Giugliano PR, Braunwald E. Selecting the best reper fusion strategy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. It’s all a matter of time. Circulation. 2003;108:2828–30.
3.
Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 ran domised trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13–20.
4.
Nallamothu B, Fox AAK, Kennelly MB, Werf F, Gore MJ, Steg G, et al. Relationship of treatment delays and mortality in patients undergoing fibrinolysis and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events BMJ 2007.
5.
Eagle KA, Nallamothu BK, Mehta RH. for the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) In vestigators. Trends in acute reperfusion therapy for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction from 1999 to 2006: we are getting better but we have got a long way to go. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:609–17.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.