×
Home
Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Review article
Crossmark

BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF BUILDING DENTAL MATERIALS AND CLINICAL CHANGES IN ORAL TISSUES CAUSED BY THEIR APPLICATION: A NARRATIVE REVIEW

By
Ana Pejčić Orcid logo ,
Milena Kostić Orcid logo ,
Milena Kostić
Ivana Stankovic Orcid logo ,
Ivana Stankovic
Radmila Obradovic Orcid logo ,
Radmila Obradovic
Marija Bradic-Vasic Orcid logo ,
Marija Bradic-Vasic
Marija Đorđević ,
Marija Đorđević
Marko Igic Orcid logo ,
Marko Igic
Nikola Gligorijević Orcid logo
Nikola Gligorijević

Abstract

Restoring the morphological and functional integrity of damaged or lost teeth and replacing them with suitable materials remains a significant challenge in modern dentistry. A continuous development of new restorative materials aims to improve mechanical properties, aesthetic outcomes, and longevity of dental restorations, while minimizing adverse biological effects. Biocompatibility represents a fundamental requirement of all dental materials, referring to their ability to perform a specific function in the oral environment without eliciting undesirable local or systemic tissue responses. The oral mucosa, including the lips, is constantly exposed to numerous physical, chemical, and biological agents that may act as irritants or sensitizers. Given that most dental materials are designed for prolonged intraoral use, their continuous contact with oral tissues can influence mucosal integrity and function. Clinical manifestations of adverse reactions vary in severity and presentation, often depending on the material composition, exposure duration, and individual patient sensitivity. Local tissue reactions associated with dental materials include conditions such as oral stomatitis, mechanical trauma, thermal and chemical burns, toxic effects, and allergic reactions. Accurate diagnosis and identification of the underlying causative factor are essential for selecting appropriate therapeutic measures and preventing complications. The growing demand for aesthetic and durable restorations underscores the importance of continuous evaluation and improvement of material biocompatibility in contemporary dental practice.

References

1.
Dee KC, Puleo DA, Bizios R. An Introduction To Tissue‐Biomaterial Interactions. Wiley; 2002.
2.
Ferreira L, Rafael A, Lamghari M, Barbosa MA, Gil MH, Cabrita AMS, et al. Biocompatibility of chemoenzymatically derived dextran‐acrylate hydrogels. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2004;68A(3):584–96.
3.
Gligorijević N, Kostić M, Tačić A. Antimikrobna svojstva akrilatnih smola za stomatološke proteze impregniranih nano česticama srebra. Acta Stomatol Naissi. 2017;(75):1696–702.
4.
HAMANN CP, DEPAOLA LG, RODGERS PA. Occupation-related allergies in dentistry. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2005;136(4):500–10.
5.
Hanks CT, Wataha JC, Sun Z. In vitro models of biocompatibility: A review. Dental Materials. 1996;12(3):186–93.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.