Restoring the morphological and functional integrity of damaged or lost teeth and replacing them with suitable materials remains a significant challenge in modern dentistry. A continuous development of new restorative materials aims to improve mechanical properties, aesthetic outcomes, and longevity of dental restorations, while minimizing adverse biological effects. Biocompatibility represents a fundamental requirement of all dental materials, referring to their ability to perform a specific function in the oral environment without eliciting undesirable local or systemic tissue responses. The oral mucosa, including the lips, is constantly exposed to numerous physical, chemical, and biological agents that may act as irritants or sensitizers. Given that most dental materials are designed for prolonged intraoral use, their continuous contact with oral tissues can influence mucosal integrity and function. Clinical manifestations of adverse reactions vary in severity and presentation, often depending on the material composition, exposure duration, and individual patient sensitivity. Local tissue reactions associated with dental materials include conditions such as oral stomatitis, mechanical trauma, thermal and chemical burns, toxic effects, and allergic reactions. Accurate diagnosis and identification of the underlying causative factor are essential for selecting appropriate therapeutic measures and preventing complications. The growing demand for aesthetic and durable restorations underscores the importance of continuous evaluation and improvement of material biocompatibility in contemporary dental practice.
Dee KC, Puleo DA, Bizios R. An Introduction To Tissue‐Biomaterial Interactions. Wiley; 2002.
2.
Ferreira L, Rafael A, Lamghari M, Barbosa MA, Gil MH, Cabrita AMS, et al. Biocompatibility of chemoenzymatically derived dextran‐acrylate hydrogels. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2004;68A(3):584–96.
3.
Gligorijević N, Kostić M, Tačić A. Antimikrobna svojstva akrilatnih smola za stomatološke proteze impregniranih nano česticama srebra. Acta Stomatol Naissi. 2017;(75):1696–702.
4.
HAMANN CP, DEPAOLA LG, RODGERS PA. Occupation-related allergies in dentistry. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2005;136(4):500–10.
5.
Hanks CT, Wataha JC, Sun Z. In vitro models of biocompatibility: A review. Dental Materials. 1996;12(3):186–93.
6.
Mair L, Padipatvuthikul P. Variables related to materials and preparing for bond strength testing irrespective of the test protocol. Dental Materials. 2010;26(2):e17–23.
7.
Huang F, Tai K, Hu C, Chang Y. Citotoxic effects of denture base materials on a permanent human oral epithelial cell line and on primary human oral fibroblasts in vitro. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;(5):439–43.
8.
Igic M, Kostic M, Basic J, Krunic N, Pejcic A, Gligorijevic N, et al. Bleeding Index and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 as Gingival Inflammation Parameters after Chemical-Mechanical Retraction Procedure. Medical Principles and Practice. 2020;29(5):492–8.
9.
ABDULLAH AO, TSITROU EA, POLLINGTON S. Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM vs conventional provisional crowns. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2016;24(3):258–63.
10.
Valéria P, Alves M, Filho RML, Telles E. Surface roughness of acrylic resins after AFMN. Biomedicine. 2025;(3):313–27.
11.
Azeredo J, Azevedo NF, Briandet R, Cerca N, Coenye T, Costa AR, et al. Critical review on biofilm methods. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 2016;43(3):313–51.
12.
Bakopoulou A, Mourelatos D, Tsiftsoglou AS, Giassin NP, Mioglou E, Garefis P. Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of different types of dental cement on normal cultured human lymphocytes. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2009;672(2):103–12.
13.
Bakopoulou A, Mourelatos D, Tsiftsoglou AS, Mioglou E, Garefis P. Sister-chromatid exchange, chromosomal aberrations and delays in cell-cycle kinetics in human lymphocytes induced by dental composite resin eluates. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2008;649(1–2):79–90.
14.
Balać I, Bugarski B, Ćosić I. Biomaterijali, 1sted. 2010;
15.
Browne RM. Animal tests for biocompatibility of dental materials—relevance, advantages and limitations. Journal of Dentistry. 1994;22:S21–4.
16.
Mihaela Roxana Cimpan, Roald Matre,. The effect of heat- and auto-polymerized denture base polymers on clonogenicity, apoptosis, and necrosis in fibroblasts: denture base polymers induce apoptosis and necrosis. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2000;58(5):217–28.
17.
Čolić M. Gradivni stomatološki materijali (dostignuća i perspektive): Stomatološki fakultet Beograd. 2007;
18.
Blakey R, Mah J. Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;(1):528–31.
19.
Arima T, Murata H, Hamada T. Properties of highly cross-linked autopolymerizing reline acrylic resins. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1995;73(1):55–9.
20.
Azzarri MJ, Cortizo MS, Alessandrini JL. Effect of the curing conditions on the properties of an acrylic denture base resin microwave-polymerised. Journal of Dentistry. 2003;31(7):463–8.
21.
Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2003;90(5):474–97.
22.
Chandra J, Kuhn DM, Mukherjee PK, Hoyer LL, McCormick T, Ghannoum MA. Biofilm Formation by the Fungal Pathogen Candida albicans : Development, Architecture, and Drug Resistance. Journal of Bacteriology. 2001;183(18):5385–94.
23.
Caulfield MJ, Qiao GG, Solomon DH. Some Aspects of the Properties and Degradation of Polyacrylamides. Chemical Reviews. 2002;102(9):3067–84.
24.
Silva D, De Castro L, Tango H, R. Evaluation of flexural resistance of a denture base acrylic resin reinforced with glass fiber and with composite resin. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2010;(3):107–10.
25.
Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, Ozcan M. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2003;123(5):540–6.
26.
Kostić M, Stanojević J, Tačić A, Gligorijević N, Nikolić L, Nikolić V, et al. Determination of residual monomer content in dental acrylic polymers and effect after tissues implantation. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2020;34(1):254–63.
27.
Kostic M, Krunic N, Najman S, Nikolic L, Nikolic V, Rajkovic J, et al. Artificial saliva effect on toxic substances release from acrylic resins. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2015;72(10):899–905.
28.
Koutis D, Freeman S. Allergic contact stomatitis caused by acrylic monomer in a denture. Australasian Journal of Dermatology. 2001;42(3):203–6.
29.
Krunić N, Kostić M, Petrović M. Oralno zdravlje i kvalitet života bezubih pacijenata nakon podlaganja totalnih zubnih proteza. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2015;(4):307–11.
30.
Krunić N, Kostić M, Anđelković M. Acrylic resins-still irreplaceable materials in prosthetic dentistry. Acta Stomatol Naissi. 2007;747–52.
31.
Abbas G, Fleming GJP, Harrington E, Shortall ACC, Burke FJT. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. Journal of Dentistry. 2003;31(6):437–44.
32.
Direct and indirect restorative materials. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2003;134(4):463–72.
33.
Al-Hiyasat AS, Darmani H, Milhem MM. Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental resin composites and their flowable derivatives. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2005;9(1):21–5.
34.
Aljabo A, Xia W, Liaqat S, Khan MA, Knowles JC, Ashley P, et al. Conversion, shrinkage, water sorption, flexural strength and modulus of re-mineralizing dental composites. Dental Materials. 2015;31(11):1279–89.
35.
FERRACANE JL. Elution of leachable components from composites. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1994;21(4):441–52.
36.
Ferracane J. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in n AFMN. Biomedicine. 2025;(3):313–27.
37.
Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dental Materials. 2006;22(3):211–22.
38.
Ferracane JL. Resin composite—State of the art. Dental Materials. 2011;27(1):29–38.
39.
Freilich M, Meiers J, Duncan J. Fibrereinforced Composite in Clinical Dentistry. 2000;
40.
Hervás-García A, Martínez-Lozano M, Jet CV. Composite resins. A review of the materials and clinical indications. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;215–20.
41.
Hesaraki S, Karimi M, Nezafati N. The synergistic effects of SrF2 nanoparticles, YSZ nanoparticles, and poly-ε-l-lysin on physicomechanical, ion release, and antibacterial-cellular behavior of the flowable dental composites. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2020;109:110592.
42.
Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Quirynen M. The Influence of Direct Composite Additions for the Correction of Tooth Form and/or Position on Periodontal Health. A Retrospective Study. Journal of Periodontology. 1998;69(4):422–7.
43.
Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 1997;105(2):97–116.
44.
Rashid H. The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: A review of literature. European Journal of Dentistry. 2014;08(04):571–9.
45.
Al Edris A, Al Jabr A, Cooley RL, Barghi N. SEM evaluation of etch patterns by three etchants on three porcelains. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1990;64(6):734–9.
46.
Andersson M, Odén A. A new all-ceramic crown: A dense-sintered, high-purity alumina coping with porcelain. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1993;51(1):59–64.
47.
Anusavice K, Phillip’s. A division of Reed Elsevier India Pvt Ltd. Science of Dental Materials. 2010;655–720.
48.
Atala M, Gul E. How to Strengthen Dental Ceramics. Int J Dent Sci Res. 2015;(2):24–7.
49.
Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, Reich E, Sculean A, Netuschil L. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2002;110(1):48–53.
50.
Babu P, Jithendra, Rama K, Alla. Dental Ceramics: Part I -An Overview of Composition, Structure and Properties. Am J Mater Engin and Technol. 2015;(1):13–8.
51.
Bona A, Pecho O, Alessandretti R. Zirconia as a Dental Biomaterial. Materials. 2015;8(8):4978–91.
52.
Denry I. How and when does fabrication damage adversely affect the clinical performance of ceramic restorations? Dental Materials. 2013;29(1):85–96.
53.
Denry IL. Recent Advances in Ceramics for Dentistry. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine. 1996;7(2):134–43.
54.
Dhillon J, Tayal S, Tayal A. Clinical aspects of adhesion of all ceramics: An Update. Ind J Dent Sci. 2012;(4):123–6.
Elmaria A, Goldstein G, Vijayaraghavan T, Legeros RZ, Hittelman EL. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2006;96(5):345–53.
57.
Wang J, Lai C, Listgarten M. Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Bacteroides forsythus AFMN. Biomedicine. 2025;(3):313–27.
58.
Wang J, Lai C, Listgarten MA. Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Bacteroides forsythus in plaque subjacent to bridge pontics. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1998;25(4):330–3.
59.
Warashina H, Sakano S, Kitamura S, Yamauchi KI, Yamaguchi J, Ishiguro N, et al. Biological reaction to alumina, zirconia, titanium and polyethylene particles implanted onto murine calvaria. Biomaterials. 2003;24(21):3655–61.
60.
Al Jabbari YS. Physico-mechanical properties and prosthodontic applications of Co-Cr dental alloys: a review of the literature. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2014;6(2):138.
61.
Bashabsheh AHA, Darmani O, H. Elements released from dental casting alloys and their cytotoxic effects. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;(5):473–8.
62.
Andersen KE, Hjorth N, Menné T. The baboon syndrome: systemically‐induced allergic contact dermatitis*. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;10(2):97–100.
63.
Anusavice K. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 11th ed. 2003;
64.
Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, Reich E, Sculean A, Netuschil L. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2002;110(1):48–53.
65.
Barrett RD, Bishara SE, Quinn JK. Biodegradation of orthodontic appliances. Part I. Biodegradation of nickel and chromium in vitro. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1993;103(1):8–14.
66.
Lee SP, Lee SJ, Lim BS, Ahn SJ. Surface Characteristics of Orthodontic Materials and Their Effects on Adhesion of Mutans streptococci. The Angle Orthodontist. 2009;79(2):353–60.
67.
Majumdar P, Lee E, Gubbins N, Stafslien SJ, Daniels J, Thorson CJ, et al. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of quaternary ammonium-functionalized POSS (Q-POSS) and polysiloxane coatings containing Q-POSS. Polymer. 2009;50(5):1124–33.
68.
Mehulić K I sar. Dentalni materijali. 2017;
69.
Mei L, van der Mei HC, Ren Y, Norde W, Busscher HJ. Poisson Analysis of Streptococcal Bond Strengthening on Stainless Steel with and without a Salivary Conditioning Film. Langmuir. 2009;25(11):6227–31.
70.
Meštrović S, Strujić M. Nikl -titanske slitine: primjena u ortodonciji. Sonda. 2004;9–12.
71.
Mitchell D, Synnott S, Van Dercreek J. Tissue reaction involving an intraoral skin graft and CP titanium abutments: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;(1):79–84.
72.
Müller K, Valentine-Thon E. Hypersensitivity to titanium: clinical and laboratory evidence. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 2006;(1):31–5.
73.
Muraisi E. Retentive forces and fitting accuracy of repaired akers clasps using laser welding. Tsurumi Univ Dent. 2010;53–65.
74.
Murata H, Koepsel RR, Matyjaszewski K, Russell AJ. Permanent, non-leaching antibacterial surfaces—2: How high density cationic surfaces kill bacterial cells. Biomaterials. 2007;28(32):4870–9.
75.
Khudhur AS, Di Zenzo G, Carrozzo M. Oral lichenoid tissue reactions: diagnosis and classification. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 2014;14(2):169–84.
76.
Ariyawardana A. Traumatic oral mucosal lesions: A mini review and clinical update. Oral Health and Dent Management. 2014;(2):254–9.
Williams DF. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2008;29(20):2941–53.
79.
Orlov S, Kojović D, Mirković B. Oralna medicina Sitomehanika. 2001;
80.
Ozcelik O, Haytac MC, Akkaya M. Iatrogenic Trauma to Oral Tissues. Journal of Periodontology. 2005;76(10):1793–7.
81.
Paravina M, Spalević M, Stanojević M, Tiodorović J. Dermatovenerologija (za studente stomatologije). 2010;
82.
Arnaud R, Soares M, Santos M, Santos E. Denture stomatitis: prevalence and correlation with age and gender. Rev Beas Cienc Saude. 2012;(1):39–62.
83.
Ata SO, Yavuzyılmaz H. In vitro comparison of the cytotoxicity of acetal resin, heat‐polymerized resin, and auto‐polymerized resin as denture base materials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2009;91B(2):905–9.
84.
Dahlén G, Blomquist S, Carlén A. A retrospective study on the microbiology in patients with oral complaints and oral mucosal lesions. Oral Diseases. 2009;15(4):265–72.
85.
GAUCH LMR, SILVEIRA-GOMES F, PEDROSA SS, ESTEVES RA, MARQUES-DA-SILVA SH. Relationship among local and functional factors in the development of denture stomatitis in denture wearers in northern Brazil. Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. 2014;43(5):314–8.
86.
Hague BA, Honnas CM. Traumatic Dental Disease and Soft Tissue Injuries of the Oral Cavity. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice. 1998;14(2):333–47.
87.
Byakodi R, Shipurkar A, Byakodi S, Marathe K. Prevalence of Oral Soft Tissue Lesions in Sangli, India. Journal of Community Health. 2011;36(5):756–9.
88.
Baković T. Erozija na oralnoj sluznici (diferencijalna dijagnoza). 2016;
89.
Devani A, Barankin B, Dermacase. Angular cheilitis. Can Fam Physician. 2007;1022–3.
90.
O’Neil DW, Clark MV, Lowe JW, Harrington MS. Oral trauma in children: A hospital survey. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1989;68(6):691–6.
91.
Emami E, Taraf H, De Grandmont P. The association of denture stomatitis and partial removable dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;(2):113–9.
92.
Love WD, Goska FA, Mixson RJ. The etiology of mucosal inflammation associated with dentures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1967;18(6):515–27.
93.
Bagga S, Thomas B, Bhat M. Garlic burn as selfinfliceted mucosal injury-a case report and review of the literature. Quintessence Int. 2008;(6):491–4.
94.
Blanksma CJ, Brand HS. Cocaine abuse: orofacial manifestations and implications for dental treatment. International Dental Journal. 2005;55(6):365–9.
95.
Gilvetti C, Porter SR, Fedele S. Traumatic chemical oral ulceration: a case report and review of the literature. British Dental Journal. 2010;208(7):297–300.
96.
Cury PR, Araujo NS, das Graças Alonso Oliveira M, dos Santos JN. Association between oral mucosal lesions and crack and cocaine addiction in men: a cross-sectional study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25(20):19801–7.
97.
Gagari E, Kabani S. Adverse effects of mouthwash use. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 1995;80(4):432–9.
98.
Holmes R, Chan D, Singh B. Chemical burn of the buccal mucosa. Am J Dent. 2004;219–20.
99.
Isenberg S, Hier L, Chauvin P. Chemical burns of the oral mucosa: report of a case. J Can Dent Assoc. 1996;262–4.
100.
Balos S, Balos T, Sidjanin L. Study of PMMA biopolymer properties treated by microwave energy. Materiale plastice. 2011;127–31.
101.
Ivković N, Božović D, Ristić S, Mirjanić V, Janković O. THE RESIDUAL MONOMER IN DENTAL ACRYLIC RESIN AND ITS ADVERSE EFFECTS. Contemporary Materials. 2013;4(1).
102.
Jorge JH, Giampaolo ET, Machado AL, Vergani CE. Cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins: a literature review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2003;90(2):190–3.
103.
Kostić M, Krunić N, Nikolić L, Nikolić V, Najman S, Kostić I, et al. Uticaj redukcije rezidualnog monomera na kvalitet akrilatnih stomatoprotetskih materijala. Hemijska industrija. 2011;(2):171–7.
104.
Kostic M, Najman S, Kocic J, Krunic N, Ajdukovic Z, Petrovic D, et al. Effect of denture base resin extracts on HeLa cells growth in vitro. Hemijska industrija. 2008;62(3):217–22.
105.
Lefebvre C, Schuster G, Marr J, Knoernschild K. The effect of pH on the cytotoxicity of eluates fromdenture base resins. Inter J Prosthod. 1995;122–8.
106.
Kanerva L, Alanko K, Estlander T. Allergic contact gingivostomatitis from a temporary crown made of methacrylates and epoxy diacrylates. Allergy. 1999;54(12):1316–21.
107.
Khamaysi Z, Bergman R, Weltfriend S. Positive patch test reactions to allergens of the dental series and the relation to the clinical presentations. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55(4):216–8.
108.
Syed M. Allergic Reactions to Dental Materials- A Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH. 2015;
109.
Axéll T. Hypersensitivity of the oral mucosa: clinics and pathology. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2001;59(5):315–9.
110.
Ismail SB, Kumar SKS, Zain RB. Oral lichen planus and lichenoid reactions: etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, management and malignant transformation. Journal of Oral Science. 2007;49(2):89–106.
111.
Segura-Egea J, Bullón-Fernández P. Lichenoid reaction associated to amalgam restoration. Med Oral, Patol Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2004;(5):423–4.
112.
Ferguson M, Aydin M, Mickel J. Halitosis and the Tonsils: A Review of Management. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 2014;151(4):567–74.
113.
Fourie J, Van Heerden W, Mceachen S. Chronic ulcerative stomatitis: a distinct clinical entity. S Afr Dent J. 2011;(3):119–21.
114.
Kapoor U, Sharma G, Juneja M, Nagpal A. Halitosis: Current concepts on etiology, diagnosis and management. European Journal of Dentistry. 2016;10(02):292–300.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
