SummaryResearch is an approach with which human beings can attempt to answer questions and discover the unknowns. Research methodology is something that is determined by the researcher’s attitude toward the universe as well as by the question he is trying to answer. Some essential questions regarding the research process are: “What is the nature of reality?”, “What is the nature of the relationship between the scholar and the subject of interest?”, and “How can one understand the subject, and what are the methods?”. Research approaches can be categorized as quantitative and qualitative. In the former, measurement, prediction, and control are the bases, while in the latter, exploring, describing, and explaining the phenomena are fundamental. Among qualitative research methods, phenomenography is one of the newest methods. However, in spite of proving to be useful in various disciplines, it has yet to become popular, and many scholars mistake it for phenomenology. The focus of phenomenography is on what is known as the second-order perspective and the different ways that people can experience the same phenomenon, while phenomenology primarily emphasizes the first-order perspective and the similar essences that are derived from various experiences. This article aims to provide a better understanding of phenomenography through explaining it and comparing it with phenomenology in order to facilitate its proper and timely application in medical studies.
References
1.
Brammer J. A phenomenographic study of registered nurses’ understanding of their role in student learning—An Australian perspective. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2006;43(8):963–73.
2.
Marton F. Phenomenography ? Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science. 1981;10(2):177–200.
3.
Maybee C. Undergraduate Perceptions of Information Use: The Basis for Creating User-Centered Student Information Literacy Instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2006;32(1):79–85.
4.
Flodén A, Forsberg A. A phenomenographic study of ICU-nurses’ perceptions of and attitudes to organ donation and care of potential donors. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2009;25(6):306–13.
5.
Ramritu PL, Barnard A. New nurse graduates’ understanding of competence. International Nursing Review. 2001;48(1):47–57.
6.
Bell L. Patient-Centered Care. American Journal of Critical Care. 2014;23(4):325–325.
7.
Boon S, Johnston B, Webber S. A phenomenographic study of English faculty’s conceptions of information literacy. Journal of Documentation. 2007;63(2):204–28.
8.
Linder C, Marshall D. Reflection and phenomenography: towards theoretical and educational development possibilities. Learning and Instruction. 2003;13(3):271–84.
9.
Dowling M. From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2007;44(1):131–42.
10.
Webb G. Deconstructing deep and surface: Towards a critique of phenomenography. Higher Education. 1997;33(2):195–212.
11.
Laverty SM. Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2003;2(3):21–35.
12.
Svensson L. Theoretical Foundations of Phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development. 1997;16(2):159–71.
13.
Sjöström B, Dahlgren LO. Applying phenomenography in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002;40(3):339–45.
14.
Barnard A, McCosker H, Gerber R. Phenomenography: A Qualitative Research Approach for Exploring Understanding in Health Care. Qualitative Health Research. 1999;9(2):212–26.
15.
Richardson JTE. The Concepts and Methods of Phenomenographic Research. Review of Educational Research. 1999;69(1):53–82.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
