×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Research paper

Functional Outcome and Quality of Life After Restorative Proctocolectomy and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Elderly Patients

By
Gjorgji Jota ,
Gjorgji Jota
Zoran Karadžov ,
Zoran Karadžov
Milčo Panovski ,
Milčo Panovski
Nenad Joksimović ,
Nenad Joksimović
Andrijan Kartalov ,
Andrijan Kartalov
Radomir Gelevski ,
Radomir Gelevski
Vladimir Joksimović
Vladimir Joksimović

Abstract

References

1.
Chapman JR. Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis. Archives of Surgery. 2005;140(6):534.
2.
COHEN Z, McLEOD RS, STEPHEN W, STERN HS, OʼCONNOR B, REZNICK R. Continuing Evolution of the Pelvic Pouch Procedure. Annals of Surgery. 1992;216(4):506–12.
3.
Gorfine SR, Gelernt IM, Bauer JJ, Harris MT, Kreel I. Restorative proctocolectomy without diverting ileostomy. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1995;38(2):188–94.
4.
Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau J, Pocard M, Valleur P. Factors Associated with Clinically Significant Anastomotic Leakage after Large Bowel Resection: Multivariate Analysis of 707 Patients. World Journal of Surgery. 2002;26(4):499–502.
5.
Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Remzi FH, et al. A Comparison of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) Following Proctocolectomy. Annals of Surgery. 2006;244(1):18–26.
6.
Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, Autschbach F, Stern J, Lucas M, et al. Risk Factors for Ileoanal J Pouch-Related Septic Complications in Ulcerative Colitis and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Annals of Surgery. 2002;235(2):207–16.
7.
Yu CS, Pemberton JH, Larson D. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with indeterminate colitis. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2000;43(11):1487–96.
8.
NELSON H. Predictors of surgical outcomes. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2002;17(s1).
9.
Pinto RA, Canedo J, Murad-Regadas S, Regadas SF, Weiss EG, Wexner SD. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in elderly patients: is there a difference in morbidity compared with younger patients? Colorectal Disease. 2011;13(2):177–83.
10.
Dayton MT, Larsen KR. Should older patients undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis? The American Journal of Surgery. 1996;172(5):444–8.
11.
Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. BMJ. 1978;2(6130):85–8.
12.
Takao Y, Gilliland R, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Wexner SD. Is Age Relevant to Functional Outcome After Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis? Annals of Surgery. 1998;227(2):187–94.
13.
Tulchinsky H, Hawley PR, Nicholls J. Long-Term Failure After Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis. Annals of Surgery. 2003;238(2):229–34.
14.
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-Sphincter Disruption during Vaginal Delivery. New England Journal of Medicine. 1993;329(26):1905–11.
15.
Lewis WG, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Axon AT, Johnston D. Restorative proctocolectomy with end to end pouch-anal anastomosis in patients over the age of fifty. Gut. 1993;34(7):948–52.
16.
Berndtsson I, Öresland T, Hultén L. Sexuality in patients with ulcerative colitis before and after restorative proctocolectomy: a prospective study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2004;39(4):374–9.
17.
Delaini GG, Scaglia M, Colucci G, Hultén L. The ileoanal pouch procedure in the long–term perspective: a critical review. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2005;9(3):187–92.
18.
Shen B, Lashner BA, Bennett AE, Remzi FH, Brzezinski A, Achkar JP, et al. Treatment of Rectal Cuff Inflammation (Cuffitis) in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Following Restorative Proctocolectomy and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2004;99(8):1527–31.
19.
Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, et al. IIeal Pouch-Anal Anastomoses Complications and Function in 1005 Patients. Annals of Surgery. 1995;222(2):120–7.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.