×
Home
Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Original article
Crossmark

Efficacy of Intravenous Administration of Iron Sucrose for Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Patients With Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

By
Nirmala Lakkawar ,
Nirmala Lakkawar
Santoshi Sankaran ,
Santoshi Sankaran
Thirupurasundari Rangaswamy
Thirupurasundari Rangaswamy

Abstract

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is the most common nutritional disorder in the world and is more prevalent among the female population in developing countries compared to developed countries. IDA in India accounts for more than 51% among the adult women population. This condition in females with gynaecological ailments not only delays the elective surgical procedures, but also increases the morbidity in patients. Depending on the available resources, the most common method of diagnosing IDA in individuals involves determining the blood haemoglobin and/or haematocrit levels. Among the red cell indices, mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular haemoglobin are the two most sensitive indices of iron deficiency. The traditional choice of treatment for IDA involves administration of iron supplements to the patients. The oral therapy is time-consuming and probably not enough in severe cases of anemia. Parenteral injections of iron-dextran/sorbitol complex have its own limitations and disadvantages. Blood transfusion is the last resort, but involves the risk of cross reactions and viral infections. Considering the advantages and limitations of the available options, intravenous iron sucrose therapy has been reported to be safe, convenient more effective than intramuscular or intravenous iron-dextran/sorbitol complex in treatment for iron deficiency anaemia. The present study encompasses the efficacy and safety of intravenous administration of iron sucrose in the management of iron deficiency anaemia in patients with various gynaecological ailments. The study concludes that iron sucrose complex can be considered as a “first choice” in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in preoperative patients and provides a safe as well as effective alternative to blood transfusion. 

References

1.
Skikne B, Flowers C, Cook J. Serum transferrin receptor: a quantitative measure of tissue iron deficiency. Blood. 1990;75(9):1870–6.
2.
Bailie GR, Clark JA, Lane CE, Lane PL. Hypersensitivity reactions and deaths associated with intravenous iron preparations. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2005;20(7):1443–9.
3.
Krafft A, Perewusnyk G, Hänseler E, Quack K, Huch R, Breymann C. Effect of postpartum iron supplementation on red cell and iron parameters in non‐anaemic iron‐deficient women: a randomised placebo‐controlled study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2005;112(4):445–50.
4.
Perewusnyk G, Huch R, Huch A, Breymann C. Parenteral iron therapy in obstetrics: 8 years experience with iron–sucrose complex. British Journal of Nutrition. 2002;88(1):3–10.
5.
Bashiri A, Burstein E, Sheiner E, Mazor M. Anemia during pregnancy and treatment with intravenous iron: review of the literature. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2003;110(1):2–7.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Citations

Crossref Logo

2

Crossref Logo

Zaynab Al-Eisawi, Eman Rababah

(2020)

The Burden of Anaemia Among Women in Jordan

Current Womens Health Reviews, 16(3)

10.2174/1573404816999200420083638

Crossref Logo

Sibylle A. Kozek-Langenecker, Aamer B. Ahmed, Arash Afshari, Pierre Albaladejo, Cesar Aldecoa, Guidrius Barauskas, Edoardo De Robertis, David Faraoni, Daniela C. Filipescu, Dietmar Fries, Thorsten Haas, Matthias Jacob, Marcus D. Lancé, Juan V.L. Pitarch, Susan Mallett, Jens Meier, Zsolt L. Molnar, Niels Rahe-Meyer, Charles M. Samama, Jakob Stensballe, Philippe J.F. Van der Linden, Anne J. Wikkelsø, Patrick Wouters, Piet Wyffels, Kai Zacharowski

(2017)

Management of severe perioperative bleeding

European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 34(6)

10.1097/EJA.0000000000000630

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.