This is an open uncontrolled study about the positive effects of a four-week rehabilitation spa program on the quality of life of 74 patients with ankylosing spondylitis. We assessed the following health status parameters on admission and discharge from the Institute Igalo, Montenegro: BASFI, BASDAI, ASDAS-CRP, ASAS 20 improvement criteria and SF-36 questionnaire. It was a "test-retest study". All the patients had six days of spa physical therapy per week during the four-week rehabilitation program, which made 24 therapy days in total. Therapy sets included the exercise program in gym and pool with mineral water, breathing exercises, massage therapy, balneotherapy (mud packs of baths, mineral and pearl baths, underwater massages), electrotherapy, sonotherapy, as well as thalassotherapy. Physiotherapy was prescribed by physician individually according to general health status and eventual contraindications. In all the observed parameters, statistical analysis showed that there was a highly significant improvement (p < 0.01). After four weeks of spa rehabilitation, ASAS 20 improvement index was achieved in 74.3% of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Conclusions were that four weeks of complex spa physical therapy program in Institute Igalo led to a significant improvement of assessed parameters of disease activity, functional status and in domains of quality of life.
References
1.
Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Medicine. 2016;4.
2.
Medical Outcomes Trust Editors. How to Score the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36. 1994.
3.
Zochling J. Measures of symptoms and disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Scale (ASQoL), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS‐G), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Dougados Functional Index (DFI), and Health Assessment Questionnaire for the Spondylarthropathies (HAQ‐S). Arthritis Care & Research. 2011;63(S11).
4.
Dagfinrud H, Hagen KB, Kvien TK. Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009(2).
5.
LUBRANO E, D’ANGELO S, SPADARO A, PALAZZI C, OLIVIERI I. Rehabilitation for Ankylosing Spondylitis in the Era of Biologics: Any Room Left for This Treatment? The Journal of Rheumatology. 2011;38(7):1228–30.
6.
Drăgoi RG, Amaricai E, Drăgoi M, Popoviciu H, Avram C. Inspiratory muscle training improves aerobic capacity and pulmonary function in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2016;30(4):340–6.
7.
Levitova A, Hulejova H, Spiritovic M, Pavelka K, Senolt L, Husakova M. Clinical improvement and reduction in serum calprotectin levels after an intensive exercise programme for patients with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2016;18(1).
8.
Pécourneau V, Degboé Y, Barnetche T, Cantagrel A, Constantin A, Ruyssen-Witrand A. Effectiveness of Exercise Programs in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2018;99(2):383-389.e1.
9.
Lukas C, Landewé R, Sieper J, Dougados M, Davis J, Braun J, et al. Development of an ASAS-endorsed disease activity score (ASDAS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2009;68(1):18–24.
10.
Xu M, Lin Z, Deng X, Li L, Wei Y, Liao Z, et al. The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score is a highly discriminatory measure of disease activity and efficacy following tumour necrosis factor- inhibitor therapies in ankylosing spondylitis and undifferentiated spondyloarthropathies in China. Rheumatology. 2011;50(8):1466–72.
11.
Lubrano E, D’Angelo S, Parsons WJ, Corbi G, Ferrara N, Rengo F, et al. Effectiveness of rehabilitation in active ankylosing spondylitis assessed by the ASAS response criteria. Rheumatology. 2007;46(11):1672–5.
12.
Dagfinrud H, Mengshoel AM, Hagen KB, Loge JH, Kvien TK. Health status of patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison with the general population. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2004;63(12):1605–10.
13.
Karagülle M, Kardeş S, Karagülle MZ. Real-life effectiveness of spa therapy in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a retrospective study of 819 patients. International Journal of Biometeorology. 2017;61(11):1945–56.
14.
Cozzi F, Ciprian L, Carrara M, Galozzi P, Zanatta E, Scanu A, et al. Balneotherapy in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases—a narrative review. International Journal of Biometeorology. 2018;62(12):2065–71.
15.
Kjeken I, Bø I, Rønningen A, Spada C, Mowinckel P, Hagen K, et al. A three-week multidisciplinary in-patient rehabilitation programme had positive long-term effects in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2013;45(3):260–7.
16.
Staalesen Strumse Y, Nordvåg B, Stanghelle J, Røisland M, Winther A, Pajunen P, et al. Efficacy of rehabilitation for patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Comparison of a four-week rehabilitation programe in a Mediteranean and a Norwegian setting. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2011;43(6):534–42.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
