×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Research paper

Inequalities in the education of midwives in Europe

By
Milena Zlatanović ,
Milena Zlatanović
Ljiljana Antić ,
Ljiljana Antić
Dragan Radosavljević ,
Dragan Radosavljević
Dragan Antić ,
Dragan Antić
Mile Despotović ,
Mile Despotović
Jelena Aleksandrić ,
Jelena Aleksandrić
Deana Švaljug
Deana Švaljug

Abstract

Although midwifery in Serbia has a long tradition, in the last decades, and especially in the last years since the Republic of Serbia is in the process of joining the European Union, this profession faces numerous challenges both in the context of formal education and the role that in the 21st century midwife has in practice. The midwife profession is faced with numerous challenges related to demographic trends and demands and expectations of a contemporary woman. The aim of the paper was to examine the difference in standards in the education of midwives in Serbia, and the neighbouring countries and Europe. Professional publications related to education and practice of midwives, published in Serbia, the neighbouring countries and Europe have been used. According to the presentation of standards and competencies of midwives in Serbia and education standards under Directive 2005/36/EZ and 2013/55/EU as well as the role and tasks midwives have in our country and European countries, there is a need for harmonization of standards in the education of midwife nurses and accreditation of joint study programs of professional master studies for nurses and midwives within the educational system of Serbia, all in the context of new paradigm of health care, which implies a holistic approach to women's health, a personalized approach and a self-protection concept. It is necessary to reform the education system of midwives in Serbia in accordance with the requirements of Directive2005/36/EZ, 2013/55/EU.

References

1.
Emons JK, Luiten MIJ. Midwifery in Europe, An inventory in fifteen EU-member states http://www.deloitte.nl/downloads/documents/we bsite_deloitte/Gzpubl Verloskundein Europa Rapport.pdf.
2.
McNeill J, Doran J, Lynn F, Anderson G, Alderdice F. Public health education for midwives and midwifery students: a mixed methods study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2012;12(1).
3.
Antić D, Lj A, Aleksopulos H. The Challenges in higher professional education of medical professionals. International Journal. 2017;(wledge.17 (3)):1219–22.
4.
November CM. Geneva, Address at the WHO Congress on Traditional Medicine. 2008;
5.
Radovanović D, Radovanović G, Lj A. Promocija zdravlja -sveobuhvatni pristup ka unapređenju zdravlja pojedinca i populacije. PONS. 2010;7:161–6.
6.
EFN Guideline for the implementation of Article 31 of the Mutual Recognition of Professional Qualifications Directive 2005/36/EC, amended by Directive 2013/55/EU. In: EFN Competency Framework Adopted at the EFN General Assembly. 2015.
7.
D. K, A C. The role of professional and regulatory organizations in the education of health professionals. In: ReFEEHS Project Symposium Current practice and challenges in education within the health professions, 2016 Proceedings book.
8.
Wickham S. Impact of formal educational level on clinical specialist role activity. British Journal of Nursing. 2014;23(3):167–73.
9.
Aune I, Olufsen V. ‘From fragmented to interdisciplinary understanding of integrated antenatal and postnatal care’—An interprofessional project between public health nursing students and midwifery students. Midwifery. 2014;30(3):353–8.
10.
Midwives in Europe mid-18th to 21st centuries.
11.
Finderle B, Kunina B. Primaljstvo u Hrvatskoj, Prvi kongresbabica Beograd, Zbornik radova. 2015;
12.
Švaljug D, Kunak Z. Školovanje primalja u Republici Hrvatskoj i stjecanje kompetencija u primaljstvu.Primaljski. 2018;23(5):30–5.
13.
Jerković I, Gavrilov-Jerković V, Mihić I. Dometi reforme obrazovanja u Srbiji. In: XVII Skup Trendovi razvoja: “Evropa 2020 - društvo zasnovano na znanju” Kopaonik. 2011.
14.
Castro Lopes S, Nove A, ten Hoope-Bender P, de Bernis L, Bokosi M, Moyo NT, et al. A descriptive analysis of midwifery education, regulation and association in 73 countries: the baseline for a post-2015 pathway. Human Resources for Health. 2016;14(1).
15.
Luyben A, Barger M, Avery M, Bharj KK, O’Connell R, Fleming V, et al. Exploring global recognition of quality midwifery education: Vision or fiction? Women and Birth. 2017;30(3):184–92.
16.
Katalog radnih mesta.
17.
Antić D, Lj A, Aleksopulos H, Jurinjak Z. Simulacioni blok u VMŠSS Ćuprija. TREND. 2019;
18.
Bojanić V. Aktuelna praksa i izazovi u akademskom obrazovanju medicinskih sestara. In: ReFEEHS Project Symposium Current practice and challenges in education within the health professions, 2016 Proceedings book.
19.
Keighley T. Standardi Evropske Unije za profesije medicinskih sestara i babica: Informacije za zemlje u procesu pristupanja.
20.
International Confederation of Midwives, Member association capacity assessment tool (MACAT. 2014;
21.
Antic LG, Djikanovic BS, Antic DZ, Aleksopulos HG, Trajkovic GZ. Differencies in the Level of Knowledge on Cervical Cancer among Health Care Students, Midwives and Patients in Serbia. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2014;15(7):3011–5.
22.
Ljiljana A, Dragan A, Dragana R. Women’s attitudes about the role of the midwife in the implementation of screening programs for cervical cancer. PONS - medicinski casopis. 2013;10(3):104–8.
23.
Finnerty G, Bosanque A, Aubrey D. Charting the history of midwifery education. Pract Midwife. 2013;16(8):23–5.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.