×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Research paper

Morphological Variation of Fissure and Lobe of the Left Lung: A Case Report

By
Atoni Atoni Dogood ,
Atoni Atoni Dogood
Oyinbo Charles Aidemise ,
Oyinbo Charles Aidemise
Udoye Ezenwa Patrick
Udoye Ezenwa Patrick

Abstract

Abstract The left lung usually has an oblique fissure that divides it into superior and inferior lobes. Some variants in the lobar fissure are well known, but the knowledge of certain uncommon variants will enhance our anatomical understanding and proper identification of the bronchopulmonary segments. Several imaging techniques have been used to describe anatomical variations of the lung, but studies that utilize dissections as tools for understanding lobar variations were limited. In this report, we described an incomplete horizontal fissure, bifurcated accessory fissure, incomplete superior and middle lobes, and fibrous condensation of the left lung pulmonary pleura observed during dissection. The knowledge of these anatomical variations will be useful in surgical segmental resection and lobectomy, and for accurate interpretations of medical diagnostic images.

References

1.
Ozmen CA, Nazaroglu H, Bayrak AH, Senturk S, Akay HO. Evaluation of interlobar and accessory pulmonary fissures on 64‐row MDCT. Clinical Anatomy. 2010;23(5):552–8.
2.
Wei Q, Hu Y, MacGregor JH, Gelfand G. Identification of lobar fissures in pathological lungs. 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. 2010. p. 5347–50.
3.
Joshi S, Kotecha S. Lung growth and development. Early Human Development. 2007;83(12):789–94.
4.
Arıyürek MO, Gülsün M, Demirkazık F. Accessory fissures of the lung: evaluation by high-resolution computed tomography. European Radiology. 2001;11(12):2449–53.
5.
Muttikkal TJE, Deng C. Non-Azygos Accessory Fissure in Right Upper Lobe Associated with Superior and Inferior Accessory Fissures in Right Lower Lobe. Journal of Clinical Imaging Science. 2:79.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.