×
Home
Current Archive Submission Guidelines
News Contact
Research paper

Peri-Orbital Human Dirofilariosis: A Pitfall for Experimental ELISA

By
Gabriella Cancrini ,
Simona Gabrielli ,
Simona Gabrielli
Suzana Otašević ,
Suzana Otašević
Nataša Miladinović-Tasić ,
Nataša Miladinović-Tasić
Aleksandar Tasić ,
Aleksandar Tasić
Jovana Đorđević
Jovana Đorđević

Abstract

The dog nematodes Dirofilaria immitis (D. immitis) and D. repens, well known as zoonotic agents, can infect humans in whom they usually produce abortive infections or immature worms. Dirofilarioses, asymptomatic in most patients and suspected only when the worm reaches surface locations or imaging detects coin lesions, are underdiagnosed because both physicians do not consider this aetiology and the human immune response blocks the worm development at early larval stages, difficult to be located. The identification of the infecting species is based on morphological/genetical study of surgically removed specimens. Serology should be an alternative to the invasive methods, also useful to detect hidden infections; nevertheless, at present, there are no commercial kits to specifically diagnose human dirofilarioses.
The aim of the study was to test the sensitivity of experimental serological assays in a case of peri-ocular dirofilariosis caused by D. repens, which had been identified by morphology and molecular methods (PCR).  
Serological investigations included two serum samples, one before surgery intervention and the other one six months after extirpating the worm. Specific antibodies against both somatic/metabolic antigens of D. repens and D. immitis adult specimens, and against antigens of the filarial endosymbionts belonging to the genus Wolbachia were evaluated. Sera were submitted to experimental enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) protocols, and to an ELISA commercial kit available to diagnose human tropical filarioses.  
Diagnostic significant titres of specific antibodies by any applied test were not found.  
As suspected, peri-ocular case of human infection due to D. repens proved a pitfall for serology, even if immunodiagnostic tests are designed with a wide range of antigens that are released by the worm, starting from its penetration in the human host.

References

1.
Favia G, Lanfrancotti A, Torre A, Cancrini G, Coluzzi M. Advances in the identification of Dirofilaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis by a PCR-based appro ach. Parassitologia. 1997;39(4):401–2.
2.
Perera L, Perez-Arellano JL, Cordero M, Simon F, Muro A. Utility of antibodies against a 22 kD molecule of Dirofilaria immitis in the diagnosis of human pulmonary dirofilariasis. Trop Med Int Health. 1998;3(2):151–5.
3.
Perera L, Muro A, Cordero M, Villar E, Simon F. Evaluation of a 22 kDa Dirofilaria immitis antigen for the immunodiagnosis of human pulmonary dirofilari osis. Trop Med Parasitol. 1994;45(3):249–52.
4.
Cancrini G, Marcos-Atxutegi C, Gabrielli S, Kramer LH, Simón F. Lack of humoral response to Wolbachia endosymbionts in humans infected by Dirofilaria rep ens. Parassitologia. 2004;46(suppl).
5.
Muro A, Genchi C, Cordero M. Human dirofilariasis in the European Union. Parasitol Today. 1999;15, (9:386–9.
6.
Tasic S, Stoiljkovic S, Miladinovic Tasic N, Tasic A, Mihailovic D, Rossi L, et al. Subcuta neous dirofilariosisi in South-Serbia-case report. Zoo noses and Public Health. 2010;
7.
Marcos-Atxutegi C, Gabrielli S, Kramer LH, Cancrini G, Simón F. Antibody response against Dirofilaria spp. and the Wolbachia endosymbiont in naturally infected canine and human hosts. In: Proceeding of the IX Euro pean Multicolloquim Of Parasitology 2000. p. 297 302.
8.
Cancrini G, Montoya MN, G. P, Bornay-Linares FJ. Current advances in experimental diagnosis of hu man and animal dirofilariosis. In: Heartworm infection in humans and animals. 2001. p. 103–20.
9.
Cancrini G, Prieto G, G. F. Serological assays on eight cases of human dirofilariasis identified by morphology and DNA diagnostics. Ann Trop Med Para sitol. 1999;93, (2:147–52.
10.
Cancrini G, Pietrobelli M, Regalbono AF, Tampieri MP, Torre A. Development of Dirofilaria and Setaria nematodes in Aedes albopictus. Para ssitologia. 1995;37(2–3):141–5.
11.
Favia G, Lanfrancotti A, Della Torre A, Cancrini G, M C. Polymerase chain reaction-identification of Diro filaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis. Parasitology. 1996;113(6):567–71.
12.
Prieto G, Cancrini G, Genchi C, Simón F. Seroepide miology of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in humans from three areas of southern Europe. Res& Rev Parasitol. 2000;60:95–8.
13.
Nozais JP, Bain O, Gentilini M. A case of subcutaneous Dirofilaria (Nochtiella) repens with microfilaremia ori ginating in Corsica. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1994;87(3):183–5.
14.
Bezic J. Human dirofiliariasis in Croatia. Acta Dermato venerol Croat. 2009;17(1):82–3.
15.
Babal P, Kobzova D, Novak I, Dubinsky P, Jalili N. First case of cutaneous human dirofilariosis in Slovak Repu blic. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2008;109(11):486–8.
16.
Darchenkova NN, G SV, Guzeeva MV, Morozov EN, Zhukova LA, Sergiev VP. Prevalence of human dirofilariasis in Russia. Med Parazitol (Mosk. 2009;3:7.
17.
Szenasi Z, Kovacs AH, Pampiglione S. Human dirofilariosis in Hungary: an emerging zoonosis in cen tral Europe. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008;120(3–4).
18.
Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Mortarino M, Genchi M, Cringoli G. Climate and Dirofilaria infection in Europe. Vet Parasitol. 2009;163(4):286–92.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.