Introduction. Traumatic injury to the cervical segment of the spinal cord causes disability and quadriplegia. Upper extremity mobility and restoration of hand function for people with quadriplegia is a priority. With coordinated electrical stimulation of peripheral muscles and nerves, known as functional electrical stimulation (FES), this is possible. Upper limb stimulators are designed to increase the physical function and are controlled by users through preserved, uncoupled and limited voluntary movements. Aim. By reviewing the available literature, the aim of the paper was to prove the importance of FES in motor control and functional ability of the upper limbs of people with quadriplegia. Material and method. Using the keywords "quadriplegia", "FES", "upper extremity", "functional ability", "motor control" and "traumatic injury", the three authors searched the databases PubMed, EMBASE, SciELO, BMC, Academia according to pre-established criteria. Edu, Web of Science and Science & Technology (November 2021 - March 2022). Potential papers were selected using the Jovell and Navarro-Rubio classification of study design. Papers older than five years, papers that were not available in their entirety, or in English, were excluded. Fifty-seven papers were classified, and six were included in the research. Results. Functional electrical stimulators improved the functional ability of the upper extremities shortly after application. They cause neurophysiological changes in the central nervous system and cortical reorganization depending on the synchronization of the voluntary command and the successful execution of the planned task. Sensory stimulation is important in the preservation of neurological function because by synchronizing the voluntary command and successfully executing the planned task, neuroplasticity is stimulated. Conclusion. With the emergence of more research and analysis of the obtained results, we can expect the creation of new programs to improve the recovery process of the upper extremities, a greater degree of independence in daily life activities, and a better quality of life for people with quadriplegia.
References
1.
Popovic MR, Kapadia N, Zivanovic V, Furlan JC, Craven BC, McGillivray C. Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy of Voluntary Grasping Versus Only Conventional Rehabilitation for Patients With Subacute Incomplete Tetraplegia. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2011;25(5):433–42.
2.
Thorsen R, Dalla Costa D, Beghi E, Ferrarin M. Myoelectrically Controlled FES to Enhance Tenodesis Grip in People With Cervical Spinal Cord Lesion: A Usability Study. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 14.
3.
Bockbrader M, Annetta N, Friedenberg D, Schwemmer M, Skomrock N, Colachis S, et al. Clinically Significant Gains in Skillful Grasp Coordination by an Individual With Tetraplegia Using an Implanted Brain-Computer Interface With Forearm Transcutaneous Muscle Stimulation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2019;100(7):1201–17.
4.
Likitlersuang J, Koh R, Gong X, Jovanovic L, Bolivar-Tellería I, Myers M, et al. EEG-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy With Automated Grasp Selection: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2018;24(3):265–74.
5.
Márquez-Chin C, Popovic MR, Cameron T, Lozano AM, Chen R. Control of a neuroprosthesis for grasping using off-line classification of electrocorticographic signals: case study. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(11):802–8.
6.
Ajiboye AB, Willett FR, Young DR, Memberg WD, Murphy BA, Miller JP, et al. Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration. The Lancet. 2017;389(10081):1821–30.
7.
Jovanovic LI, Popovic MR, Marquez-Chin C. KITE-BCI: A brain-computer interface system for functional electrical stimulation therapy. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2021;44(sup1):S203–14.
8.
Müller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Pfurtscheller G, Rupp R. EEG-based neuroprosthesis control: A step towards clinical practice. Neuroscience Letters. 2005;382(1–2):169–74.
9.
Pfurtscheller G, Müller GR, Pfurtscheller J, Gerner HJ, Rupp R. ‘Thought’ – control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia. Neuroscience Letters. 2003;351(1):33–6.
10.
Yozbatiran N, Francisco GE. Robot-assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 2019;30(2):367–84.
11.
Jovell AJ, Navarro-Rubio MD. Evaluación de la evidencia científica [Evaluation of scientific evidence. Med Clin (Barc. 1995;105(19):740–3.
12.
Kapadia N, Moineau B, Popovic MR. Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Retraining Reaching and Grasping After Spinal Cord Injury and Stroke. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 14.
13.
Ciancibello J, King K, Meghrazi MA, Padmanaban S, Levy T, Ramdeo R, et al. Closed-loop neuromuscular electrical stimulation using feedforward-feedback control and textile electrodes to regulate grasp force in quadriplegia. Bioelectronic Medicine. 2019;5(1).
14.
Bersch I, Fridén J. Role of Functional Electrical Stimulation in Tetraplegia Hand Surgery. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2016;97(6):S154–9.
15.
Milosevic M, Marquez-Chin C, Masani K, Hirata M, Nomura T, Popovic MR, et al. Why brain-controlled neuroprosthetics matter: mechanisms underlying electrical stimulation of muscles and nerves in rehabilitation. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2020;19(1).
16.
Bouton CE, Shaikhouni A, Annetta NV, Bockbrader MA, Friedenberg DA, Nielson DM, et al. Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia. Nature. 2016;533(7602):247–50.
17.
Marquez-Chin C, Popovic MR. Functional electrical stimulation therapy for restoration of motor function after spinal cord injury and stroke: a review. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2020;19(1).
18.
Cacho EWA, Cacho R de O, Ortolan RL, Lima NMFV, Silva Filho EM da, Cliquet Jr A. REACH AND PALMAR GRASP IN TETRAPLEGICS WITH NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. 24(6):450–4.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
