Introduction. Laryngectomy is a surgical procedure for the removal of the larynx, either entirely (total laryngectomy) or partially (partial laryngectomy). Rehabilitation of laryngectomy patients is a complex process that involves physical, psychological, and social aspects. To improve the quality of life of laryngectomy patients, rehabilitation consists of several phases that include learning alternative ways of speaking, breathing and swallowing exercises, and psychological support. It is important to emphasize that rehabilitation is a long-term process that requires continuous support for patients to achieve the best results. With the right approach and professional help, rehabilitation can significantly improve the quality of life of laryngectomy patients. This paper aims to review relevant literature in order to present the possibilities of verbal communication in patients after laryngectomy. Methods. The methods used in this study include searching websites such as www.pubs.asha.org, www.cjcrcn.org, www.scielo.org, www.journals.ekb.eg, www.biomedcentral.com, and www.dovepress. com for the papers published in Serbian and English from 2018 to 2022. Overview. This paper provides an overview of speech rehabilitation in laryngectomy patients, various methods of treating larynx cancer, and a review of current literature in the field of laryngectomy. Conclusion. After total laryngectomy, patients need to undergo intensive speech rehabilitation to regain the ability of verbal communication. This process requires a multidisciplinary approach, including various specialists such as speech therapists, phoniatrists, oncologists, surgeons, and psychologists.
References
1.
Quadri MFA, Alamir AWH, John T, Nayeem M, Jessani A, Tadakamadla SK. Effect of prosthetic rehabilitation on oral health-related quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Translational Cancer Research. 2020;9(4):3107–18.
2.
Kotake K, Kai I, Iwanaga K, Suzukamo Y, Takahashi A. Effects of occupational status on social adjustment after laryngectomy in patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2019;276(5):1439–46.
3.
Wang XT, Shan CG. The progress of voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019;33(7):677–81.
4.
Tsao CK, Marchi F, Kang CJ, Sampieri C, Lu YA, Huang SF, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Vocal Outcomes and Quality of Life after Total Laryngectomy and Voice Restoration with J-Flap and Tracheoesophageal Puncture. Cancers. 14(3):544.
5.
Abdel-Haleem AK, Hasan ES, Roushdy M, Abdel-Wahab M. Evaluation of post total laryngectomy voice rehabilitation by Provox®2 voice prosthesis (preliminary study). Egyptian Journal of Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology. 2019;5(2):9–21.
6.
Nocini R, Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Biological and epidemiologic updates on lip and oral cavity cancers. Annals of Cancer Epidemiology. 4:1–1.
7.
Azizli E, Alkan Z, Koçak I, Yiğit Ö. Voice Onset Time in Patients Using Speech Prosthesis After Total Laryngectomy. Journal of Voice. 2022;36(6):879.e1-879.e4.
8.
Harris BN, Hoshal SG, Evangelista L, Kuhn M. Reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology. 2020;5(4):703–7.
9.
Brook I, Goodman JF. Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis Use and Maintenance in Laryngectomees. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology. 2020;24(04):e535–8.
10.
Massaro N, Verro B, Greco G, Chianetta E, D'Ecclesia A, Saraniti C. Quality of Life with Voice Prosthesis after Total Laryngectomy. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 33(5).
11.
Tang JA, McCarroll L, Schmalbach CE. Voice Restoration and Quality of Life in Larynx Cancer. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2023;56(2):361–70.
12.
Sharpe G, Camoes Costa V, Doubé W, Sita J, McCarthy C, Carding P. Communication changes with laryngectomy and impact on quality of life: a review. Quality of Life Research. 2019;28(4):863–77.
13.
Mella MH, Chabrillac E, Dupret-Bories A, Mirallie M, Vergez S. Transoral Robotic Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer: Advances and Residual Knowledge Gaps. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 12(6):2303.
14.
Aupérin A. Epidemiology of head and neck cancers: an update. Current Opinion in Oncology. 2020;32(3):178–86.
15.
Galli A, Giordano L, Biafora M, Tulli M, Di Santo D, Bussi M. Voice prosthesis rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: are satisfaction and quality of life maintained over time? Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 39(3):162–8.
16.
Iype EM, Janardhanan D, Patil S, Suresh S, Varghese BT, Thomas S. Voice Rehabilitation After Laryngectomy: A Regional Cancer Centre Experience and Review of Literature. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2020;72(4):518–23.
17.
Ueha R, Magdayao RB, Koyama M, Sato T, Goto T, Yamasoba T. Aspiration prevention surgeries: a review. Respiratory Research. 24(1).
18.
Cocuzza S, Maniaci A, Grillo C, Ferlito S, Spinato G, Coco S, et al. Voice-Related Quality of Life in Post-Laryngectomy Rehabilitation: Tracheoesophageal Fistula’s Wellness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(12):4605.
19.
Hoffmann TK. Total Laryngectomy—Still Cutting-Edge? Cancers. 13(6):1405.
20.
Gates GA, Ryan W, Cooper JC, Lawlis GF, Cantu E, Lauder E, et al. Current status of laryngectomee rehabilitation: I. Results of therapy. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 1982;3(1):1–7.
21.
Weber F, Schuss U, Sittel C. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Palliativchirurgie im Kopf-Hals-Bereich. HNO. 2020;68(7):498–502.
22.
Kahmke R, Sajisevi M. Larynx Cancer. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2023;56(2):333–43.
23.
Okafor S, Awaonusi OO, Watts TL, Cannon TY. Salvage Surgery. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2023;56(2):323–31.
24.
Bodd MH, McCammon SD. Laryngeal Cancer and the End of Life (As We Know It). Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2023;56(2):403–12.
25.
Koroulakis A, Cancer AML. 2022;
26.
Obid R, Redlich M, Tomeh C. The Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2019;31(1):1–11.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
