×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Research paper

Morphometric Analysis of the Upper Premolars

By
Nenad Stošić ,
Nenad Stošić
Stefan Dačić ,
Stefan Dačić
Marina Ranđelović ,
Marina Ranđelović
Andrijana Jovančić ,
Andrijana Jovančić
Ivana Đorđević ,
Ivana Đorđević
Maja Cvetković ,
Maja Cvetković
Dušan Ilić ,
Dušan Ilić
Aleksandra Petrović ,
Aleksandra Petrović
Dragica Dačić Simonović
Dragica Dačić Simonović

Abstract

Summary Morphological and anatomical characteristics of the tooth are of great importance for clinical dentistry. These aspects of the tooth can be better conceptualized from the perspective of external and internal morphology of dental crowns and roots. The aim of this study was to determine the average total length of the upper first and second premolars, the average length of crowns, the average length of roots and to determine the most common number of the roots and root canals of these teeth. We used 41 first and 48 second extracted upper premolars.The length of these teeth was measured by a digital micrometer. The number of roots was determined visually, and each tooth was longitudinally dissected across the vestibular-palatal plane for determining the number of root canals. The average total length of the upper first premolars was 22.5 mm, the average crown length was 8.8 mm, the mean root length was 13.7 mm. The upper first premolars usually have two roots in 53.7% and two root canals in 82.9%. The average total length of the upper second premolars was 22.5 mm. The average crown length was 8.4 mm and the mean root length was 14.1 mm. The upper second premolars usually have one root in 89.6% and one root canal in 79.2%. The determined average values of the length of these teeth and the length of their crowns and roots were similar to the values of the same population reported by other authors.

References

1.
Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endodontic Topics. 2005;10(1):3–29.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.