×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Research paper

Perioperative and Early Postoperative Outcome of Proximal Femoral Nailing for Stable and Unstable Trochanteric Fractures

By
Nina Đorđević ,
Nina Đorđević
Miloš Stanojlović ,
Miloš Stanojlović
Saša Milenković ,
Saša Milenković
Predrag Stojiljković ,
Predrag Stojiljković
Mirjana Kocić ,
Mirjana Kocić
Ivan Golubović
Ivan Golubović

Abstract

SummaryThe aim of the study was to analyze perioperative parameters as well as early postoperative period of patients with trochanteric fractures nailing in relation to the fracture stability.The prospective study included 46 patients with trochanteric fractures fixed with the third generation cephalomedullary nail. Two groups were formed - stable fractures (Group 1) and unstable fractures (Group 2). There were 20 patients in Group 1, and 26 in Group 2. All the patients underwent Bioimpianti “basic-nail” fracture fixation. Perioperative and early postoperative parameters were monitored and the groups were compared.The average duration of surgery in both groups was not significantly different. The number of patients needing transfusion as well as the average transfusion volume was similar in both groups. Average Intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hospitalization were longer in Group 1, though not significantly. In both groups, 80% of patients started early rehabilitation according to the protocol.Trochanteric fracture fixation with Bioimpianti “Basic-nail” is a minimally invasive, safe method, giving the similar perioperative and early postoperative outcome regardless of the fracture stability. It enables fast postoperative recovery and reduction of early postoperative complications.

References

1.
Menezes DFA, Gamulin A, Noesberger B. Is the Proximal Femoral Nail a Suitable Implant for Treatment of All Trochanteric Fractures? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2005;439(NA;):221–7.
2.
Stevanovic V, Blagojevic Z, Ganic Z, Diklic I, Crnobaric A, Glisic M. Intramedullary fixation and proximal femoral fractures: Diversity in use through case reports. Acta chirurgica Iugoslavica. 2010;57(1):35–40.
3.
Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JWM, Al-Lami M. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury. 2002;33(5):395–9.
4.
Jensen JS, Michaelsen M. Trochanteric Femoral Fractures Treated with McLaughlin Osteosynthesis. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1975;46(5):795–803.
5.
Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, van der Heijden FHWM, den Hoed PT, Kerver AJH, et al. Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British volume. 2004;86-B(1):86–94.
6.
Evans EM. THE TREATMENT OF TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British volume. 1949;31-B(2):190–203.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.